Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 8(SUPPL 1):S482-S483, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1746379

ABSTRACT

Background. We observed an increase in central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) associated with the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and performed a retrospective analysis to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on CLABSI rates. Methods. Retrospective review was done for all CLABSI in adults meeting National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria in 2020 at an 889-bed teaching hospital. CLABSIs in encounters with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (COVID CLABSI) were compared with CLABSIs in encounters without a COVID diagnosis (non-COVID CLABSI). As a secondary analysis, we also reviewed all CLABSI occurrence in 2019. Characteristics were compared using Mid-P Exact (Poisson) and Chi Squared (categorical) Tests. Subjective data collected by infection preventionists during realtime case reviews with clinical staff of each CLABSI was also reviewed. Results. In 2020, the rate of COVID CLABSI (CLABSI/1000 catheter days) was 6.6 times greater than the rate of non-COVID CLABSI (5.47 vs. 0.83, p< 0.001). In the COVID CLABSI group we observed higher rates of occurrence in the ICU setting (94% vs 28%, p< 0.001), in house mortality (53% vs 26% P=0.0187), presence of arterial lines (91% vs 20%, p< 0.001) and increased number of catheter lumens (4 vs 3, p< 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the distribution of pathogens. No significant differences were observed between 2019 CLABSI and 2020 non-COVID CLABSI. Real-time case reviews identified changes in nurse staffing, increased nurse: patient ratios, delays in routine central line dressing changes, and inconsistent use of alcohol-impregnated port protectors as possible contributing factors. Table 1. 2020 COVID CLABSI vs 2020 non-COVID CLABSI A comparison of selected patient and catheter characteristics in COVID CLABSI vs non-COVID CLABSI in 2020 Table 2. 2019 CLABSI vs 2020 non-COVID CLABSI A comparison of selected patient and catheter characteristics in CLABSI in 2019 vs non-COVID CLABSI in 2020 Figure 2. CLABSI rate in 2019 vs COVID CLABSI and non-COVID CLABSI in 2020 A comparison of CLABSI rates (displayed in infections/1000 catheter days) in all adult inpatients at our institution for calendar years 2019 and 2020, with the infections in 2020 divided into those that occurred during an encounter with a PCR -confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and those without. Conclusion. We observed a dramatically higher rate of CLABSI in patients with COVID-19 in 2020, while the rate of CLABSI in patients without COVID-19 remained unchanged from the year prior. Higher rates of ICU admission, critical illness, increased numbers of lumens, increased presence of arterial lines, nurse staffing changes, and gaps in routine line prevention processes associated with emergency measures in the COVID-19 cohort ICU may have contributed to this finding. Further work is needed to better understand how to minimize process-related disruptions in central line care during a hospital response to a pandemic.

2.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 8(SUPPL 1):S484, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1746378

ABSTRACT

Background. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) data have revealed an increase in CLABSI associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, but data on factors mediating the increase are limited. Our hospital had been free of CLABSI for 18 months, but we encountered an outbreak of 7 CLABSI over a 5-month period beginning in November 2020. This led to an investigation that revealed that some underlying issues were related to COVID-19. Methods. Infection prevention staff at Omaha's Veterans Affairs Medical Center interviewed hospital staff and performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CLABSI (based on the NHSN definition) amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Results. The first case of CLABSI in the outbreak was detected in November 2020. Prior to that, there was no case of CLABSI since April 2019, as shown in the graph. Each case of CLABSI was associated with a different microorganism. Further investigation revealed deviations from our usual practices in central line dressing care. Our response to COVID-19 had included alterations in periodic competency training (including dressing care) for nursing staff as well as the rapid introduction of streamlined inpatient nursing documentation. Previously, dressing kits included chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings;in November, a kit without these dressings was introduced. A weekly audit of dressing care was begun in March 2021. No CLABSI was identified in April 2021. Conclusion. We encountered a CLABSI outbreak associated with deviations from usual central line dressing care. Using the concept of the Swiss cheese model of error prevention, we recognized alterations in three barriers: competency training;thorough documentation;and complete supply kits. The first two of these factors were directly related to our COVID-19 response. Our findings illustrate the relevance of the Swiss cheese model for maintaining a safe healthcare environment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL